地质科学
     首页 | 过刊浏览 |  本刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  期刊征订 |  留言板 |  批评建议 |  联系我们 |  English
地质科学  1975, Vol. 10 Issue (1): 12-31    DOI:
论文 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索  |   
河南嵩山区震旦系古构造型式
马杏垣, 索书田, 闻立峰, 王维襄
PALEOSTRUCTURAL TYPE OF THE SINIAN SYSTEM, SUNGSHAN AREA, HONAN PROVINCE
MA HSINQ-TUAN, So SHU-TIEN, WEN LI-FENG, WANG WEI-HSIANG
 全文: PDF (2340 KB)   HTML( )   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 

引言前人对本区震旦系的研究多侧重地层的划分和对比,而对其构造则重视不够。作者等虽多年来着重研究本区的构造形变史,但对震旦系构造特征的认识,长期以来只看到一些表面现象,而对其本质的认识则经历了一个不断反复和深化的过程。首先是震旦系和寒武系的接触关系,在豫西、华北乃至中国东部,它们之间都主要是假整合的平行接触关系,也就是在震旦纪末波状运动基础上,寒武纪海浸超覆。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词:   
Abstract

The results of this paper are only a part of a longer study concerning the deformational history of the whole Sungshan area.The late precambrian Sinian System of this area rests unconformably on the basement complex and separates from overlying Cambrian System by an unconformity that truncates the underlying folds. It shows intense Alpine-type deformation, whereas outside this area, the corresponding strata lie parallel with the Cambrian.There is a detachment along the plastic Puyu pellite. The faults parallel to the bottom and top of this formation are plainly normal faults, yet the structural relationship does not fit the standard dynamic setting of the normal fault. The upper unit became intensely folded and piled up into cascades, whereas the underlying unit Maanshan sandstone was only gently flexured and having not shared the same lateral movement. They are thus true slides. The most feasible way to explain the actual mechanism of the whole structure is to say that the sliding system was em-placed by down slope gliding of strata propelled by the force of gravity acting on its own mass, with local modifications due to the interply of pressure and frictional resistance.Observations, based on many years’ detailed mapping from the favorably preserved and beautifully exposed rock units, bring out a sinuous curve pattern of the structure. The apex of the main arc, which we called the Wufoshan arc, faces towards the south. It’s two wings presenting oppositely directed curvatures, called the reflex arcs. Symmetrical with respect to the two wings and the reflex ares, there is a belt of gently folded broad anticlines and synclines pointing to the apex of the main arc but dying out before reaching it. This approximately meridinal belt should be designated to as the backbone of the structure. The strata lying between the backbone and the main arc was slightly disturbed. The combination of all these structural features resembles an Epsilon structural system, which indicates an unequal horizontal movement of the concerned crustal parts. Yet it is not a normal type of Bpsilon structure as established by Prof. J. S. Lee. The main difference is that the Wufoshan arc is not composed of simple compressive folded belt. It is characterized by roughly parallel belts of tensile and compressive structures. The master faults are tenso-shearing to shearing character. The folds of the sliding system delineate a cascading movement from south to north. Therefore, it is a special type of Epsilon structural system.

Key words:   
引用本文:   
. 1975, 河南嵩山区震旦系古构造型式. 地质科学, 10(1): 12-31.
. PALEOSTRUCTURAL TYPE OF THE SINIAN SYSTEM, SUNGSHAN AREA, HONAN PROVINCE[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 1975, 10(1): 12-31.
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] . 封面-目录-封底[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 0-0.
[2] 郭旭东 丁林 蔡福龙 王厚起 岳雅慧. 雅鲁藏布江缝合带西段仲巴地区俯冲—增生过程[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1031-1047.
[3] 汤文坤 李正友 段磊 王世锋. 青藏高原南羌塘盆地多玛地区晚新生代伸展构造特征[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1048-1061.
[4] 央金拉姆 季建清 徐芹芹 王昌盛 苏君 涂继耀 彭玉恒 邵媛燕 钟大赉 米玛次仁. 藏东南帕隆藏布现今河流地貌特征及其晚第四纪演化[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1062-1084.
[5] 李洪辉 董洪奎 杜德道 张立平 王祥 陈秀艳 李曰俊. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡及周缘断裂及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1085-1099.
[6] 吴晓智 周刚 何登发 王小娟 郭秋麟 郑民. 四川盆地川东地区高陡构造形成机制与天然气聚集[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1100-1113.
[7] 李大军 陈洪德 侯明才 徐胜林 庞崇友 郭海洋. 四川盆地中二叠世栖霞期—茅口期岩相古地理特征及其地球动力学机制探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1114-1134.
[8] 叶涛 韦阿娟 曾金昌 邓辉 彭靖淞 鲁凤婷. 渤海湾盆地中生代构造差异演化与潜山油气差异富集[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1135-1154.
[9] 许福美 姜琳 鲍道亮 刘明松 邱占林. 龙永煤田童子岩组层序地层格架与聚煤规律研究[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1155-1166.
[10] 林士扬 季建清 苏君. 全球地震震源深度统计分析与地震层分布[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1167-1184.
[11] 李振伟 宋传中 李加好 王阳阳 袁芳 王微 陈守文. 郯庐断裂带桐城段构造变形解析[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1185-1209.
[12] 何心月 李理. 复杂伸展盆地区平衡剖面的恢复方法[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1210-1222.
[13] 余烨 张昌民 李少华 杜家元 黄俨然 王莉. 低可容纳空间三角洲层序地层及其控砂模式[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1223-1236.
[14] 刘富军 杨庆坤 郭福生 孙传敏 陈留勤 华琛. 粤北丹霞盆地上白垩统丹霞组锦石岩段顶部泥岩岩石地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1237-1251.
[15] 宋宏 郭雪莲 贺陆胜. 晚泥盆世古土壤元素地球化学特征及其古气候意义[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1252-1264.
 
版权所有 © 2009-2017 《地质科学》编辑部
地址:北京9825信箱  邮政编码:100029
电话:010-82998109  010-82998115