地质科学
     首页 | 过刊浏览 |  本刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  期刊征订 |  留言板 |  批评建议 |  联系我们 |  English
地质科学  1985, Vol. Issue (4): 354-363    DOI:
论文 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索  |   
云南罗次澄江组下部火山岩系的发现与震旦系底界年龄的讨论
孙家璁
昆明工学院地质系
DISCOVERY OF THE VOLCANIC ROCK SERIES IN THE CHENGJIANG FORMATION AT LUOCI AREA AND DISCUSSION ON THE AGE OF THE BASAL LIMIT OF THE SINIAN SYSTEM, YUNNAN
Sun Jiacong
Department of Geology, Kunming Institute of Technology
 全文: PDF (2925 KB)   HTML( )   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 米士(1942)根据滇中澄江组与昆阳群之间的不整合面命名为晋宁运动,刘鸿允(1963)又提出以晋宁运动导致的不整合面作为震旦系的底界,这些意见曾被地质界普遍采纳。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙家璁
关键词:   
Abstract: It is generally considered that the lower boundary of the Sinian system in central Yunnan is defined by a sharp unconformity left by the Jinning orogeny, but there are two different views for the age of its lower limit, that is 900 or 800 m.y.A volcanic rock series was found by the author in the lower part of the Chengjiang Formation during the geological research in Luoci area of the central Yunnan. The Chengjiang Formation in this area may be correlated with the standard Chengjiaug Formation of the central Yunnan, it is also a red molasse formation of the continental fades, and laid over the Hcishantou Formation of the Kunyang Group with a sharp unconformity, and is over laid by the Doushantuo Formation with a weak unconformity. The volcanic rock series is occurred in the lower part of the Chengjiang Formation, and closely laid on the basal conglomerate. The rocks are mainly of basaltic lava and tuff, breccia and agglomerate, and are characterized by rich in alkaline. It represented a continental type of eruption.The Chengjiang Formation may be divided into two parts in Luoci area; the lower part is the continental basalts which may be correlated with the Suxiong Formaion of the western Sichuan, and the upper part is the red detrital deposit of river origin which may be correlated with the Chengjiang Formation of the central Yunnan. Therefore, it seems to he the transitional type between the Suxiong Formation and the Cheug-jian Formation, which are the contemporaneous deposits, but of different facies.The isotopic dating samples of the volcanic rock were collected by Institute of Geology, Academia Sinica from the base of the Chengjiang formation, and its age was determined as 885 m.y., this is an only age of the Chengjiang Formation itself in Yunnan. The age of the paisanite intruded into the volcanic rock was determined as 705 m.y. by Institute of Geology, Ministry of Metallurgical Industry. In addition, the age of the dacite which lie in the middle part of Suxiong Formation in western Sichuan is 822 m.y., and the age of carbonaceous slate of the Liubatang Formation in central Yunnan is 1002 m.y.. According to these isotopic dating data (the isochronie age of Rb-Sr), an age sequence may be obtained as follows:Doushantuo Formation——Chengjiang movement—— 7.05 m.y.The middle part of Soxiong Formation 822 m.y.The basal part of Chengjiang Formation 885 m.y.——Jinning movement—— 900 m.y.Liubatang Formation 1002 m.y.Thus, the age of the Jinning movement should be put at about 900 m.y., so that, to put the age of the lower limit of the Sinian system at about 900 m.y. is suitable in Yun. nan.
Key words:   
收稿日期: 1983-08-05;
引用本文:   
孙家璁. 1985, 云南罗次澄江组下部火山岩系的发现与震旦系底界年龄的讨论. 地质科学, (4): 354-363.
Sun Jiacong. DISCOVERY OF THE VOLCANIC ROCK SERIES IN THE CHENGJIANG FORMATION AT LUOCI AREA AND DISCUSSION ON THE AGE OF THE BASAL LIMIT OF THE SINIAN SYSTEM, YUNNAN[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 1985, (4): 354-363.
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] . 封面-目录-封底[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 0-0.
[2] 郭旭东 丁林 蔡福龙 王厚起 岳雅慧. 雅鲁藏布江缝合带西段仲巴地区俯冲—增生过程[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1031-1047.
[3] 汤文坤 李正友 段磊 王世锋. 青藏高原南羌塘盆地多玛地区晚新生代伸展构造特征[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1048-1061.
[4] 央金拉姆 季建清 徐芹芹 王昌盛 苏君 涂继耀 彭玉恒 邵媛燕 钟大赉 米玛次仁. 藏东南帕隆藏布现今河流地貌特征及其晚第四纪演化[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1062-1084.
[5] 李洪辉 董洪奎 杜德道 张立平 王祥 陈秀艳 李曰俊. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡及周缘断裂及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1085-1099.
[6] 吴晓智 周刚 何登发 王小娟 郭秋麟 郑民. 四川盆地川东地区高陡构造形成机制与天然气聚集[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1100-1113.
[7] 李大军 陈洪德 侯明才 徐胜林 庞崇友 郭海洋. 四川盆地中二叠世栖霞期—茅口期岩相古地理特征及其地球动力学机制探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1114-1134.
[8] 叶涛 韦阿娟 曾金昌 邓辉 彭靖淞 鲁凤婷. 渤海湾盆地中生代构造差异演化与潜山油气差异富集[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1135-1154.
[9] 许福美 姜琳 鲍道亮 刘明松 邱占林. 龙永煤田童子岩组层序地层格架与聚煤规律研究[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1155-1166.
[10] 林士扬 季建清 苏君. 全球地震震源深度统计分析与地震层分布[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1167-1184.
[11] 李振伟 宋传中 李加好 王阳阳 袁芳 王微 陈守文. 郯庐断裂带桐城段构造变形解析[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1185-1209.
[12] 何心月 李理. 复杂伸展盆地区平衡剖面的恢复方法[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1210-1222.
[13] 余烨 张昌民 李少华 杜家元 黄俨然 王莉. 低可容纳空间三角洲层序地层及其控砂模式[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1223-1236.
[14] 刘富军 杨庆坤 郭福生 孙传敏 陈留勤 华琛. 粤北丹霞盆地上白垩统丹霞组锦石岩段顶部泥岩岩石地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1237-1251.
[15] 宋宏 郭雪莲 贺陆胜. 晚泥盆世古土壤元素地球化学特征及其古气候意义[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4): 1252-1264.
 
版权所有 © 2009-2017 《地质科学》编辑部
地址:北京9825信箱  邮政编码:100029
电话:010-82998109  010-82998115
京ICP备05029136号-10